Assessments
that say
more.

IMPACT turns assessment results into a clear, written story about each student, class and school, so you read what the numbers mean, not just what they are.

The shift

A score is the end of the test.
Not the conversation.

Handwritten scrap: 72 circled in red, and then what?

Leaders don't need more numbers. They need to know what the numbers are trying to say.

  • 01

    A number can't tell you why

    Two students reach the same score for completely different reasons. The figure hides both of them.

  • 02

    Or who needs you now

    The result rarely shows which child is quietly slipping behind, or who's ready to be stretched.

  • 03

    Or what to do on Monday

    A mark closes the page. Leaders and teachers need the next sentence, not just the last one.

Score → Story

The same result, finally in words.

Just the score

72/100

English · Class 7

…and then what?

IMPACT reads it

What it says

Ananya · English · Class 7

Aarav understands what he reads and reasons about it well, comprehension is a real strength. Where he loses marks is in getting his thinking onto the page: his answers are shorter than his ideas. He needs practice turning good thinking into full, written answers.

Suggested next step

One short written response a week with a sentence-starter, and praise the explaining, not just the answer.

Written for a parent or a teacher. No jargon, no decoding required.

Observation → Action

The same lesson,
finally in findings.

A visit produces a rating. A rating produces nothing. IMPACT scores every criterion against your own written expectations, explains what was seen in plain words, and turns the gaps into tasks somebody owns.

Just the visit
3.2/4
Ms. R. Banerjee · English · Class 7 B
Proficient · Level 3 of 4
EmergingDevelopingProficientExemplary
Previous
2.9
Change
+0.3
School avg
3.0
…and then what?
What it says

A well-planned lesson that four students carried

Planning and classroom climate are strong — the objective was written up, returned to, and students were comfortable being wrong out loud. The lesson lost ground on distribution: 18 of 23 questions went to the front two rows, and the written task was set as homework rather than attempted in the room.

14 criteria rated4 evidence files19:10 · 7m talk blockSelf vs observer +0.4
Suggested next step

Six minutes of writing before the discussion, and question from a seating list so the back rows enter the lesson.

Task assigned · Ms. Banerjee · weekly · re-checked at the next observation

Written for the teacher and the coordinator. No jargon, no decoding required.

How a visit becomes a result

Four steps. Nothing stops at a number.
Step 01

Observe

On site, from a recording, or both. Each criterion is rated by choosing the written expectation that matches what happened.

You getA rating that can be explained, not defended.
Step 02

Evidence

Comments, photographs, student work and timecoded clips attach to the specific criterion they support.

You getA finding nobody has to take on trust.
Step 03

Findings in words

Strengths, gaps and priorities written for the person receiving them — teacher, coordinator or board.

You getA report read in five minutes, not filed.
Step 04

Tasks that close

Weak parameters trigger recommended tasks with owners and dates. The next visit re-checks those criteria first.

You getChange you can evidence at year end.
  • MA

    Manual observation

    An observer scores against your own criteria on phone or laptop, offline if the room has no signal. Structured, consistent, comparable across every teacher.

    4 types · external, internal, peer, self
  • AI

    AI video observation

    Upload a recording. Talk share, wait time, question spread and on-task trend measured exactly, with timecoded evidence and a confidence score on every flag.

    No observer in the room · ratings confirmed by a human
  • 1X

    One-time audit

    A single focused window — one department or one grade band — when you need a clear verdict fast. Becomes your baseline if you continue.

    No platform commitment required
One engine · every settingBrowse templates & criteria →
The Cycle

A loop that keeps measuring.

Every cycle re-tests the same criteria. Growth is measured, not assumed.

  1. 1

    Observe

    Audit, assessment or video analysis against your defined criteria.

  2. 2

    Diagnose

    The engine identifies improvement areas, tied to specific criteria.

  3. 3

    Assign

    Tasks auto-created in the Task Manager, deadlines set, owners notified.

  4. 4

    Act & Rate

    The auditee completes tasks; the manager rates quality of completion.

  5. 5

    Re-measure

    A partial re-audit on the same flagged criteria, fresh evidence.

  6. 6

    Track Growth

    Compare before / after. Reinforce growth, or escalate stalls.

What schools get

Read at every level.

Clear written reports for every student, class and school, strengths and gaps named in plain language, ready to share.

Auditor marketplace

Find a verified auditor.

Independent education auditors for quality reviews, compliance, assessment design and safeguarding. Browse, compare and request the right person for your institution.

Verified profiles Transparent charges Sector-matched
Coming Soon

Verified auditor profiles are being prepared.

The marketplace will open after the first verified reviewers, service scopes and pricing checks are complete.

How the marketplace works

  • Browse & compare

    Search verified auditors by sector, location and specialism, charges shown up front.

  • Request the right fit

    Send a brief. Compare scope, turnaround and price before you commit to anyone.

  • Audit with confidence

    Every finding runs through the IMPACT engine, scored, explained and tracked to close.

Are you an auditor?

List the services and charges you offer, reach institutions actively looking, and run every engagement on the IMPACT engine.

List your services
More in the platform

Everything an institution runs on.

Facial ID

Attendance & identity, verified in a glance.

Social

A private feed that keeps your community close.

Task Manager

Every finding becomes a tracked, owned task.

Anecdotal Records

Capture the moments numbers miss.

Notice Board

One place for what everyone needs to know.

Why leaders choose IMPACT

Numbers that
earn their place.

Every figure here is something we can point at in a report — students assessed, teachers observed, reports delivered. Nothing counted twice, nothing rounded up.

10/10
Every cohort, every time

Ten out of ten cohorts showed positive growth

Every completed baseline-to-endline cycle we have run has moved in the right direction. Not by the same amount, and not on every criterion — but no cohort has finished a cycle behind where it started.

Tested withWilcoxon signed-rank
Compared onMatched students only
Reported withEffect size, not just p
The reachWho IMPACT has been used with
SCH
0+
Schools

Individual schools, groups and institutional networks across India.

TCH
0+
Teachers

Observed and profiled across external, internal, peer and self audits.

STU
0+
Students

Assessed against criterion-mapped instruments, Early Years to Class 12.

The workWhat the platform has actually produced
ASM
0+
Assessments

Completed student assessments, each scored criterion by criterion.

OBS
0+
Observations

Classroom observations rated against written expectation statements.

RPT
0+
Reports generated

Student, section, class, school and observation reports, written in plain language.

Growth is measured baseline to endline on students present at both points, tested with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and reported with effect size. Reports are counted across all five levels — student, section, class, school and teacher observation — which is why the report count runs ahead of the assessment count.

Figures as of August 2026

See what your scores could say.

Bring IMPACT to your next set of results, and read what they really mean.